{"id":649,"date":"2008-03-23T20:10:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-23T20:10:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.cookylamoo.com\/wordpress\/?p=649"},"modified":"2010-01-02T19:57:47","modified_gmt":"2010-01-02T19:57:47","slug":"sweding-stockhausen","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/2008\/03\/sweding-stockhausen.html","title":{"rendered":"Sweding Stockhausen"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">A.O. Scott&#8217;s review of <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Be Kind Rewind<\/span> in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">The New York Times<\/span> (found via <a href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/sandow\/2008\/02\/a_seroius_problem_interlude.html\">Greg Sandow&#8217;s blog<\/a>) praises the movie&#8217;s understanding of <a href=\"http:\/\/movies.nytimes.com\/2008\/02\/22\/movies\/22rewi.html?ref=movies&amp;pagewanted=print\">how people relate to popular culture<\/a>:<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<blockquote><p>It treats movies as found objects, as material to be messed around with, explored and <span class=\"SpellE\">reimagined<\/span>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">Sandow cites this review to show that people are not passive recipients of corporate cultural artifacts, but have an active relationship with them.  &#8220;Classical music lives in a bubble&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/sandow\/2008\/02\/a_seroius_problem_interlude.html\">he writes<\/a>, meaning that the cultural elite often lives in ignorance of how popular culture works in society, but also raising the question of whether capital-A Art enjoys the same lively, engaged response from its audience as popular movies and songs.<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">Having just seen some <a href=\"http:\/\/cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/2008\/03\/diy-stockhausen.html\">DIY Stockhausen<\/a> last week, it&#8217;s great to see a perfect example of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Be_Kind_Rewind#.22Sweding.22\">Sweded<\/a> Stockhausen.  Sequenza21 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sequenza21.com\/index.php\/744\">has posted a link<\/a> to the Digital Music Ensemble, University of Michigan&#8217;s wondrous small-stage interpretation of the composer&#8217;s most notorious work, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.analogartsensemble.net\/2008\/03\/artist-formerly-known-as-stockhausen.html\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Helicopter String Quartet<\/span><\/a>.  (An excerpt of the Stockhausen original <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=13D1YY_BvWU\">is on YouTube<\/a>.)<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.virgilmoorefield.com\/Stockhausen.html\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/blogpix\/hsq_dme01.jpg\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\"><\/span><\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Helikopter-Streichquartett<\/span> has been performed only three times in its original form. A full-scale production requires four large helicopters, each with a pilot, a live musician, and a sound technician inside, as well as an elaborate communications and audio-visual transmission apparatus.<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">Faced with the daunting task of mounting a performance of even one scene of this huge work, the Digital Music Ensemble <a href=\"http:\/\/www.virgilmoorefield.com\/Stockhausen.html\">decided to stage its own interpretation of the piece<\/a>. Thus we are using model helicopters instead of full-scale ones, a quartet of electric guitarists in place of a string quartet, and we&#8217;re adding a live video processing dimension.<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify;\">Two Quicktime movies (hi-fi and lo-fi) show the reimagined composition <a href=\"http:\/\/www.virgilmoorefield.com\/Stockhausen.html\">in all its glory<\/a>.<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.virgilmoorefield.com\/Stockhausen.html\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/blogpix\/hsq_dme02.jpg\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A.O. Scott&#8217;s review of Be Kind Rewind in The New York Times (found via Greg Sandow&#8217;s blog) praises the movie&#8217;s understanding of how people relate to popular culture: It treats movies as found objects, as material to be messed around with, explored and reimagined. Sandow cites this review to show that people are not passive [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/649"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=649"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/649\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2837,"href":"https:\/\/www.cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/649\/revisions\/2837"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=649"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=649"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=649"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}