{"id":4092,"date":"2010-02-11T23:20:08","date_gmt":"2010-02-11T23:20:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/?p=4092"},"modified":"2010-02-11T23:20:08","modified_gmt":"2010-02-11T23:20:08","slug":"goodbye-to-everything","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/2010\/02\/goodbye-to-everything.html","title":{"rendered":"Goodbye to Everything"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.museumofeverything.com\/frame.html\">Museum of Everything<\/a> closes on Sunday.  This remarkable hoard of \u201coutsider art\u201d (for want of a better term) hidden away off a sidestreet in Primrose Hill has been the hotspot for jaded punters over the past few months.  The exhibition is a crash course in the past century of artworks by autodidacts, the mentally ill, folk artists, backyard shamans and the otherwise obsessed.<\/p>\n<p>This is the second ambitious attempt I&#8217;ve seen in London to find a way of accommodating this art into mainstream practice, the other being an exhibition at Whitechapel a few years ago which intermingled the &#8220;outsiders&#8221; and the, um, &#8220;insiders&#8221;.  It&#8217;s reassuring to read that the Museum founder James Brett <a href=\"http:\/\/www.moreintelligentlife.com\/content\/vendeline-von-bredow\/outsider-art-museum-everything\">rejects the term &#8220;outsider&#8221;<\/a>, preferring &#8220;self-taught&#8221;.   The unusual presentation of the exhibition doesn&#8217;t try to normalise the art, but it is similar enough to typical underground art spaces to prevent the work being trivialised.  Sensational aspects of the artists&#8217; biographies are, for the most part, kept to the minimum necessary to contextualise their art.  Strangely enough, the growth of the public&#8217;s prurient interest in other people&#8217;s private lives has met the outsiders halfway, so that scrutiny of their personal affairs is no less than for any other painter, politician or priest.<\/p>\n<p>Despite the claims of outsider art&#8217;s champions, it&#8217;s not hard to spot discrepancies between it and the &#8220;normal&#8221; art world.  This self-taught art is frighteningly earnest; it presents in starkest terms the case for art as (to adapt Ezra Pound&#8217;s saying) objects charged with meaning to the utmost possible degree.  Each item is saturated with significance, a desperate need to communicate a truth not otherwise evident in the material world.  In this respect the exhibition is the clearest possible refutation of the modern lie (told by non-artists) that art is self-expression.<\/p>\n<p>The wall texts, thankfully confined to artists and not individual works, are variable in quality and point to the greatest tensions underpinning the show.  It was a nice idea to have each text written by a different person, each presumably with some insight or deeply felt response to that particular artist.  At their best they present an interesting perspective on the artist&#8217;s work, as with the blurbs for Henry Darger and Alexandre P Lobanov.  At their worst they manifest the worst traits in discussing outsider art: hyperbole (relativism + overcompensation = genius), misrepresentation (the self-expression canard again) and London&#8217;s Appeal to Authority, the celeb endorsement (Q: Does Nick Cave really think Louis Wain is &#8220;the greatest&#8221;? A: Who cares?).  In any case the curators find it hard to discuss the artworks without making them seem like relics of a personality, surrogates for the real topic of interest &#8211; but this is a problem with most cultural criticism across the board, these days.<\/p>\n<p>Like the art itself, the exhibition was overstuffed.  Room after room crammed with paintings, drawings, sculptures, installations, of the highest overall standard I&#8217;ve seen in a big show for a long time.  I&#8217;ve been twice now and each time came away feeling overwhelmed, knowing that there was still plenty more I&#8217;d missed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Museum of Everything closes on Sunday. This remarkable hoard of \u201coutsider art\u201d (for want of a better term) hidden away off a sidestreet in Primrose Hill has been the hotspot for jaded punters over the past few months. The exhibition is a crash course in the past century of artworks by autodidacts, the mentally [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4092"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4092"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4092\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4093,"href":"https:\/\/www.cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4092\/revisions\/4093"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4092"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4092"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cookylamoo.com\/boringlikeadrill\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4092"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}